Gold Open Source
ExplorePackagesVulnerabilitiesCWEsMCP ServersScan
Login
Gold Open Source

The authoritative source for production-ready open-source components. Every package, container image, AI model, and MCP server undergoes rigorous verification for security, malware, and license compliance.

Explore Gold

  • Explore Everything
  • Packages
  • Gold Certified Packages
  • Container Images
  • AI Models
  • MCP Servers
  • Agent Skills
  • Chip Manufacturers

Security Data & Tools

  • Scan Your Dependencies
  • Trending Threats
  • Threat RSS Feeds
  • CVE Database
  • Actively Exploited (KEV)
  • SGZ Zero-Days
  • CWE Index
  • MITRE ATT&CK
  • Malicious Packages
  • Security Glossary
  • Supply-Chain Report
  • Developers (API & Badge)
  • Chrome Extension
  • Credits & Data Sources

Products

  • The Platform
  • ESSCM
  • Portal
  • TPRM
  • OSM
  • Cowork
  • Code / Runner
  • Guard

Use Cases

  • Know Your Software
  • Auto-Fix Vulnerabilities
  • Asset Discovery
  • AI Governance
  • MCP Server Security
  • Supply Chain Compliance
  • Zero-Day Discovery
  • All Use Cases

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • Documentation
  • Safeguard Academy
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 Gold Open Source. All rights reserved.

Built with care bySafeguard
Home/ATT&CK/T1102/T1102.002
MITRE ATT&CK Sub-Technique

T1102.002: Bidirectional Communication

ShareXLinkedInRedditHN

Adversaries may use an existing, legitimate external Web service as a means for sending commands to and receiving output from a compromised system over the Web service channel. Compromised systems may leverage popular websites and social media to host command and control (C2) instructions. Those infected systems can then send the output from those commands back over that Web service channel. The return traffic may occur in a variety of ways, depending on the Web service being utilized. For example, the return traffic may take the form of the compromised system posting a comment on a forum, issuing a pull request to development project, updating a document hosted on a Web service, or by sending a Tweet. Popular websites and social media acting as a mechanism for C2 may give a significant amount of cover due to the likelihood that hosts within a network are already communicating with them prior to a compromise. Using common services, such as those offered by Google or Twitter, makes it easier for adversaries to hide in expected noise. Web service providers commonly use SSL/TLS encryption, giving adversaries an added level of protection.

Tactics
Command and Control
Platforms
ESXi, Linux, macOS, Windows

▪Parent technique

T1102: Web Service

▪Mitigations (2)

M1021Restrict Web-Based Content

Restricting web-based content involves enforcing policies and technologies that limit access to potentially malicious websites, unsafe downloads, and unauthorized browser behaviors. This can include URL filtering, download restrictions, script blocking, and extension control to protect against exploitation, phishing, and malware delivery. This mitigation can be implemented through the following measures: Deploy Web Proxy Filtering: - Use solutions to filter web traffic based on categories, reputation, and content types. - Enforce policies that block unsafe websites or file types at the gateway level. Enable DNS-Based Filtering: - Implement tools to restrict access to domains associated with malware or phishing campaigns. - Use public DNS filtering services to enhance protection. Enforce Content Security Policies (CSP): - Configure CSP headers on internal and external web applications to restrict script execution, iframe embedding, and cross-origin requests. Control Browser Features: - Disable unapproved browser features like automatic downloads, developer tools, or unsafe scripting. - Enforce policies through tools like Group Policy Management to control browser settings. Monitor and Alert on Web-Based Threats: - Use SIEM tools to collect and analyze web proxy logs for signs of anomalous or malicious activity. - Configure alerts for access attempts to blocked domains or repeated file download failures.

M1031Network Intrusion Prevention

Use intrusion detection signatures to block traffic at network boundaries.

▪Used by groups (16)

G0005APT12G0007APT28G0008CarbanakG0010TurlaG0032Lazarus GroupG0034Sandworm TeamG0046FIN7G0047Gamaredon GroupG0059Magic HoundG0067APT37G0069MuddyWaterG0087APT39G0094KimsukyG0128ZIRCONIUMG1001HEXANEG1005POLONIUM

▪Software using this technique (38)

S0025CALENDARmalwareS0026GLOOXMAILmalwareS0042LOWBALLmalwareS0046CozyCarmalwareS0054CloudDukemalwareS0069BLACKCOFFEEmalwareS0126ComRATmalwareS0128BADNEWSmalwareS0213DOGCALLmalwareS0215KARAEmalwareS0216POORAIMmalwareS0218SLOWDRIFTmalwareS0229OrzmalwareS0240ROKRATmalwareS0244ComniemalwareS0248ytymalwareS0265KazuarmalwareS0270RogueRobinmalwareS0333UBoatRATmalwareS0363EmpiretoolS0379Revenge RATmalwareS0393PowerStallionmalwareS0511RegDukemalwareS0531GrandoreiromalwareS0538CrutchmalwareS0651BoxCaonmalwareS0657BLUELIGHTmalwareS0660ClamblingmalwareS1023CreepyDrivemalwareS1035Small SievemalwareS1168SampleCheck5000malwareS1170ODAgentmalwareS1171OilCheckmalwareS1172OilBoostermalwareS1201TRANSLATEXTmalwareS1210SagerunexmalwareS1222RIFLESPINEmalwareS9035LAMEHUGmalware

▪Reference

T1102.002on MITRE ATT&CK

MITRE ATT&CK® is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation.